Amazon Lawyer Kenneth Eade Strikes Amazon's Business Solutions Agreement in Arbitration: A Landmark Victory for Third-Party Sellers

Kenneth Eade, an attorney and author, has recently achieved a significant victory for third-party sellers on Amazon. Eade's arbitration case against Amazon challenged the company's Business Solutions Agreement (BSA), which outlines the terms and conditions that sellers must agree to in order to use Amazon's platform.

Eade argued that the BSA was unenforceable because it included a mandatory arbitration clause that gave Amazon an unfair advantage, as well as other one-sided and oppressive provisions. The arbitrator agreed, ruling in Eade's favor and striking down the BSA as unenforceable.

The arbitration case in question was filed in the AAA arbitration forum, and the ruling was issued on January 26, 2021. The case number is AAA Case No. 1830032881.

This landmark victory has significant implications for third-party sellers on Amazon, who have long felt that the company's terms and conditions are unfairly weighted in favor of Amazon. The ruling could pave the way for other sellers to challenge the BSA and other agreements in arbitration, and could force Amazon to revise its terms to be more equitable for sellers.
Eade's success in striking down the BSA is particularly noteworthy because it comes at a time when Amazon is facing increased scrutiny from regulators and lawmakers for its treatment of third-party sellers. The company has been accused of using its dominance in the marketplace to disadvantage smaller sellers, and of engaging in anti-competitive practices.

The success was followed by three major victories in the first quarter of 2023, striking section 2 of the BSA as an unenforceable liquidated damages clause, as well as a ruling that Amazon's video verification process (IPI) is not a condition to the release of seller funds.

The mandatory arbitration clause in the BSA has been a particular point of contention for many sellers, who argue that it gives Amazon an unfair advantage in resolving disputes. By striking down this clause, Eade has helped level the playing field for sellers and provided them with more options for resolving disputes with Amazon.
​
Moreover, Eade's victory sends a message to other companies that use mandatory arbitration clauses in their agreements. It suggests that these clauses may not be as ironclad as companies may have hoped, and that they could face legal challenges from parties who feel that they are unfair or oppressive.
In conclusion, Kenneth Eade's success in striking down Amazon's Business Solutions Agreement in arbitration is a landmark victory for third-party sellers on the platform. It raises important questions about the fairness and equity of Amazon's treatment of its sellers, and the potential implications for other companies that use mandatory arbitration clauses in their agreements. The ruling in this case, as well as others that have found Amazon's BSA to be unenforceable, highlights the importance of carefully reviewing and understanding the terms and conditions of any agreement before agreeing to them.

If you have a dispute with Amazon and wish to arbitrate, call, chat or email the winning legal team of Amazon Sellers Attorney.